last updated: 03/09/26 10:03AM gmt+8

a theory and speculation of reality

is this reality real for sentient beings? the web for avatars? the story for characters?

!barely structured raw text and uh yea get used 2 our raw text :boom:
you may've seen plots around fake realities. but for actors stored inside, it is real
the dream, it is real inside the dream and for the dream. unreal for the being at higher level, the dream is produced by them and able to be experienced by them.
it is metaspaces thing, imagine performing a role. to the play, ur character is real but ur main existence is not the character and the story's happenings and settings cannot touch you physically, if no one around plays the role

if someone gives you a virtual pet, no pet appears in some room physically, but the record in servers representing it exists, and it displays ur pet. if u lived inside the web, inside the same code environment (compatible w/it so u are its virtual owner), it'd be real 4 u. that virtual you could live on the same principles (having to eat pixel apples and etc.) or be another kind of 'materia', a category, like weather or interactable props

common subrealities that are possible by efforts of ancestor sentient beings, those who write stories or invent net devices
someone may start thinking if the current world is smth like that

sentient avatars would investigate source codes and circulate their own in order to sniff out smth abt how servers exactly look
humans lurk into quantums, relativity effects and all of those good things. but if so, the outer to biotics is as uncomprehendable as the physical to avatars
even- imagine some net entity trying their best to escape to physical. no way, nothing more than overloading the chips until its death could be done (imagine a pure enclosed sim and it does not regulate streetlights of random higher beings) it is similar to sleep paralysis when the body is asleep

whats abt our world. if. only if some experiment fr with sooo tiny regulations and so many microcalcs, do they burn hyperdim antistars 4 it- (tho possible to it, we and u cannot get bc not them)
we think the highest reality level is that one with will, the primordial thing, evidences that descend to simpliest (we mean, child sim is always simplier than ancestor) sims. still cannot tell 4 sure if the will is real but yea.
in isolated full-algo (no will) system, with no outside control and randomizer options ('variables'), 'the world formula' makes sense
this system has variables/possibilities of error bc highly tied 2 material rules that contain true random, we cannot say 4 sure if these variables r 4 random or outside 'range sliders' (or even unlimited but 'user-controlled') but we also cannot call yet any example of these finely controlled vars, probably it is mult'd in random so affectingly. dunno maybe will say more if more research.
if true - either the will we possess or points of control for higher sentient beings that may end up in having no such variables, think of ai-s making child ai-s with backwires and playing with these. only if we prove no existence of a parent reality, we will be able 2 say, w/out doubt, we have a possibility to reach these variables. bc as we said earlier, as an internet avatar, would u be able 2 get out of wires and conductors keeping urself coherent?

probablyyyy ours is the highest (have 2 mention: if some other universes exist, they may be still reachable and having the same rule principles, maybe other constants but most principles r the same (some rules may be 'dis/enabled' by setting constants 2 0 or like that, then sibling beings may be incompatible) no matter if u can't rlly travel 2 it. so the universes r located within this reality), consciousness developing isn't their main/only goal (or they r fine w/so many misc calcs) and this world seems logical and flawless. tho lookin @ virtual particles, will share thoughts sometime when formed, god seeking is somewhat delusional

maybe it is the big emergence project. microadjustments to particles were been made while testing. maybe this world is still in beta. maybe this big lab is yet enough. but it is rlly interesting how relative becomes defined. probably the core philosophy is everything's superposition

ok ok the whole idea of reality what is reality its principles

yea u can call what drives and/or directs reality, a god of it, its host is 'heavenly principles' then (is ur reality a thing came out of someone's imagination, works on code, etc.)
reality is not always equivalent to space it resides in (eg. if time travels r allowed)
dynamo! reality cannot be just a frozen snapshot (like random symbols or image cutted out) some minimal chain must be
and dynamo must affect targets
some one to experience, grow, stack, transform etc. if no one then thing. smth
the world can remember with its inside content (shape, location, energy, memory, consequences etc) so changes make sense (keep chain, on one's death nothing happened due to them disappears) (on changes reset u end this branch of reality or restart it) think of documenting events within, is it possible, is the happening coherent
events inside, at least a portion of it, are objective to the reality. and what is objective, that is real.

depending on interpretation, even the most delusional context space (like fluidy shared mind) can be considered reality (like what if delusions r caused by other's delusions and it's starting to be a multireality bc delusions r real to one in this mind)
a child reality that is controlled by parent inhabitants is not real to it by itself but events and consequences of interaction with it and reactions are real and like that - what real ones make of processed info of witness is real. the 'holy' intervention is possible by the rules (in whatever state of it) of child reality
ones from diff realities do not interact directly (if a crossover occurs, either it connects realities into one tho diff worlds, it's connected from the beginning, or creates a new one or anything) like humans cannot msg an internet avatar in a normal way w/out using any avatars bc they r not an avatar itself
autonomous sim and a fully directed by users r both real if what contains within can be considered reality, do not mess with ur local jokes compilation
something to bring child reality to existence (neural activity is enough! tho keep in mind its integrity lies on those who remember. the fact of deviation and misalignment/misinterpretation is not real for it but ur reality may dissolve). this world is self-sufficient but it does not have to be true to ur reality
primary rules should be the same (right is right). if not same - it is some variable/wildcard pick inside some rule (right can be left but always a direction, even if zero)
reality reassembly/fusion by its parent is fine, then u can seamlessly rebuild it. but if it occurs from inside, ur reality's integrity will be broken, eg. time travel dilemma. but multirealities (metaverses etc) thing can be applied to store all these branches. then, if something can travel betwen these, the split (possibly) and the branch are real in some meta way
uh may be updatin this later, forgot abt posting this article